Yes, it's a red square, with some more red, and then a bit of some darker red. Maybe to a more informed or educated art critic, this has some meaning. But when there are whole rooms - 5 to be exact - all filled with paintings much the same as this - it's very hard not to proclaim loudly and clearly that these paintings are a complete load of shite.
Moving right along...
In complete contrast to the Rothko exhibition, the National Gallery was amazing. It's difficult to express in words just how brilliant some of these paintings are. The colours are so rich, the expressions so real, the emotion so distinct - it's almost a shame that photography was invented and that such art is no longer as prominent. There's all the famous paintings that you see everywhere in print form - the Monet's, Van Gogh's, Rembrandt's... and it's pretty amazing when you realise that you're actually right there, looking at the original artwork, still in pristine condition after being painted before the 1900's.
2 comments:
is it just the photo or could Rothko not even paint in between the lines? the edges of his square look a little bit blotchy and not too straight...
It's not the picture, its Rothko! :-)
Post a Comment